In a startling revelation, the Midas Touch editorial team has exposed a supposed “undecided voter” featured on CNN’s panel following Vice President Kamala Harris’s historic speech at the Democratic National Convention (DNC). This individual, Brian Rosado, has a documented history of supporting Trump, raising questions about CNN’s vetting process and the integrity of their reporting.

During the CNN segment, Rosado was introduced as an undecided voter. He was the only panelist to give Harris a grade of “C,” while the other seven participants rated her speech with either an “A” or “B.” When asked to explain his grade, Rosado claimed that Harris wasn’t clear enough on her policies and expressed a preference for Donald Trump, stating that he would now be voting for him. This moment was quickly seized upon by pro-Trump social media accounts, amplifying Rosado’s comments as a direct attack on Harris.

However, a closer examination of Rosado’s social media history reveals a different story. His online presence is filled with pro-Trump content, including posts celebrating Trump’s mugshot and expressing disappointment in former Vice President Mike Pence for certifying the 2020 election results. This history raises a critical question: Was CNN unaware of Rosado’s background, or were they complicit in presenting him as an undecided voter?

The Midas Touch team conducted thorough research to uncover Rosado’s true affiliations. They confirmed his identity through social media and found numerous posts supporting Trump and criticizing Democratic figures. For instance, Rosado had previously tweeted about wanting Trump reinstated on Twitter and expressed frustration over Pence’s electoral certification on January 6, 2021.

The implications of CNN’s decision to feature Rosado are significant. In a moment deemed pivotal for American politics, the network presented him as a neutral voice, potentially misleading viewers who rely on CNN for accurate information. The fact that Rosado’s comments were used by the Trump campaign to undermine Harris further complicates the narrative, suggesting a calculated move by CNN to include a voice that could sway public opinion.

The editorial team highlighted that CNN had a responsibility to its audience to ensure that the individuals they present as undecided voters are genuinely impartial. Instead, they showcased someone whose social media history clearly indicates a strong alignment with Trump and the MAGA movement.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the role of media in shaping public perception becomes increasingly crucial. CNN’s portrayal of Rosado raises concerns about the standards of journalism and the importance of vetting individuals who appear on national platforms.

In conclusion, the exposure of Brian Rosado as a fake undecided voter on CNN underscores the need for greater accountability in media reporting. As viewers, it is essential to critically evaluate the information presented and the motivations behind it. The Midas Touch team’s investigation serves as a reminder that not all voices in the political discourse are as neutral as they may appear, and the implications of this can significantly influence public perception during crucial moments in American politics.