Donald Trump’s recent speech in Las Vegas on Friday night has sparked new concerns, as footage shows him addressing a notably small crowd. Despite the venue’s capacity being just 2,000 to 3,000 people, the turnout was far below that number. This underwhelming attendance, combined with Trump’s erratic speech, has raised questions about his political momentum and his current standing with supporters.

Before even delving into the substance—or lack thereof—of Trump’s speech, it’s essential to address the size of the audience. Video clips from the event show a small crowd in a modest venue, far from the packed arenas that Trump has boasted of in the past. The empty seats seemed to reflect the waning enthusiasm for the former president, signaling that his once-robust base may be shrinking.

As for the speech itself, Trump opened with bizarre and unsubstantiated claims. One of his key talking points was that Vice President Kamala Harris was somehow receiving debate questions in advance through a device in her earrings. This conspiracy theory, which originated from Trump’s surrogate, Laura Loomer, has been thoroughly debunked but was still echoed by Trump during his address. His persistence in pushing such baseless claims left many baffled and concerned about his grasp on reality.

The speech took another odd turn when Trump invited right-wing podcasters known as the “Nelk Boys” onto the stage. The group used their platform to advocate for eliminating taxes on a nicotine product called Zin, raising eyebrows about the priorities being discussed at what was supposed to be a political rally. Nicotine pouches, like Zin, are known to be highly addictive, and the inclusion of this issue in Trump’s speech seemed out of place and irrelevant to the broader political landscape.

Things only got stranger as Trump repeatedly mispronounced Vice President Harris’s name, referring to her as “Kbala” and making juvenile jokes about her name. His behavior resembled that of a petulant child rather than a former president, leaving many wondering if he was even taking the speech seriously.

Trump then pivoted to claims that he was being unfairly fact-checked by debate moderators, insisting that he was always right and they were wrong. This sentiment was consistent with his ongoing narrative that any criticism or opposition he faces is part of a broader conspiracy against him. However, even as Trump whined about being fact-checked, he continued to spread misinformation, particularly about the Haitian migrant community.

In one of the more inflammatory moments of the speech, Trump falsely claimed that Haitian migrants were taking over Springfield, Ohio. This blatant lie has been repeatedly debunked by local officials, including the town’s mayor and Ohio’s Republican governor. Nevertheless, Trump’s rhetoric has already incited violence and threats against the Haitian community in the area, forcing local schools and city hall to temporarily shut down due to safety concerns.

Despite these falsehoods, Trump still claimed he had achieved “monumental victories” in recent months. He boasted of outpolling Kamala Harris by significant margins in multiple debates and laid out dubious claims of dominating the polls, even citing improbable figures of 92% support. His exaggerations and fabrications are consistent with the pattern of misinformation that has characterized much of his political career.

In a xenophobic rant, Trump shifted his focus to Venezuelan immigrants, claiming they were carrying military-grade AK-47s and infiltrating American cities. He announced plans to “liberate” areas like Aurora, Colorado, which he claims have been overtaken by Venezuelan gangs—another right-wing conspiracy with no factual basis. Local officials, including the mayor of Aurora, have categorically denied these claims, but Trump’s repetition of such lies has contributed to a climate of fear and division.

The absurdity of Trump’s remarks didn’t stop there. He even launched into a bizarre tirade about Kamala Harris supposedly lying about having worked at McDonald’s, although there’s no evidence to support this assertion. As Trump continued, he seemed to lose track of reality, repeatedly misreading the teleprompter and making incoherent statements about “liberating” the country.

At one point, Trump declared he no longer wanted to be called “Mr. President,” preferring the title “Mr. Border.” His fixation on immigration and border security has been a hallmark of his rhetoric, but this particular statement felt out of place and disconnected from any substantive policy discussion.

Trump’s rambling continued with more attacks on the media, particularly *The New York Times* and *The Washington Post*, both of which he labeled as “failing” newspapers. In true Trump fashion, he advised the crowd to assume that anything reported by these outlets was the opposite of the truth. His assault on the press is part of a long-standing effort to undermine trust in the media and further isolate his supporters from factual reporting.

The speech reached its low point when Trump claimed that no one cares about the environment anymore, falsely stating that the word “environment” hasn’t been mentioned in seven months. This statement flies in the face of the ongoing climate crisis and the widespread concern about environmental issues that continues to dominate public discourse.

Finally, in an astonishing twist, Trump suggested that Kamala Harris was planning to bring back the military draft, even though no such proposal exists. This fearmongering seemed designed to stoke anxiety among the audience, further emphasizing Trump’s reliance on lies and scare tactics.

As the speech neared its end, Trump declared he would no longer use the word “joy” in his addresses, opting instead for terms like “opportunity” and “ambition.” This strange and unnecessary decision encapsulated the erratic nature of the entire speech, which was riddled with inaccuracies, xenophobia, and increasingly bizarre behavior.

In conclusion, Trump’s disastrous speech in Las Vegas not only highlighted his diminishing support but also raised serious concerns about his fitness to lead. His erratic behavior, penchant for spreading misinformation, and reliance on conspiracy theories continue to alienate even some of his staunchest supporters. The lackluster turnout and unhinged nature of his speech may signal that Trump’s influence is waning, even as he attempts to hold onto his political relevance.

As the 2024 election season approaches, this speech serves as a stark reminder of the chaos that follows Donald Trump, and the American people must stay informed, fact-check claims, and ensure that misinformation doesn’t cloud the democratic process.